Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05352
Original file (BC 2013 05352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05352
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, block 12b, Separation Date This Period, be changed to 
reflect 27 Dec 06 rather than 6 Dec 06 [sic]. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was on leave until 27 Dec 06.  His DD Form 214 should be 
changed to match the information reflected in the Department of 
Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) records.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a memo from the 
DVA.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 3 May 00, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.  On 
2 Dec 06, he was discharged from active duty.  He is credited with 
six years, and seven months of total active service. 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 and AF 
Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation both reflect 
his Date of Separation (DOS) as 2 Dec 06.  

DPSIPV has no reason to believe the applicant’s DOS was recorded 
in error. 

The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit B.







APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 17 Feb 14, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-05352 in Executive Session on 28 Aug 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member










The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05352 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Nov 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 10 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 14.


3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05663

    Original file (BC 2013 05663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, effective 26 Sep 78, be changed to reflect his total active service dates as 11 Dec 71 through 26 Sep 78. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05418

    Original file (BC 2013 05418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show his dates of service during the Vietnam Era. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant agrees that the DD Forms 214 have the correct dates of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00110

    Original file (BC-2013-00110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The overseas long tour ribbon was omitted based on incorrect Foreign Service time on her DD Form 214. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIPV states that the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect Date Entered Active Duty (Item 12a) and will be corrected to read 12 Aug 77. However, both the DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to the DD Form 214, reflects the applicant’s full service time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03387

    Original file (BC 2013 03387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show her Date of Enlistment (DOE) as 26 Jun 1958. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05575

    Original file (BC 2013 05575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her husband’s records be corrected to show that he was on active duty in the Army from 21 Apr 52 to 29 Jan 55. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial of the applicant’s request to correct the decedent’s service dates. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01381

    Original file (BC 2014 01381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, his record was corrected to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 18 for the scholarship program. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He believes his corrected ADSC expiration date is miscalculated for the updated AF Form 63. He agrees with DPSIPVs statement, “if the Boards decision is to grant the relief sought, the record will be adjusted to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 15.” However, if the Boards decision is to deny relief, he requests his record be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00388

    Original file (BC 2014 00388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00388 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his Total Prior Active Service as 1 month and 22 days, instead of 10 months and 15 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05135

    Original file (BC 2012 05135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 23 Jan 02 to 2 Jul 01 or in the alternative his TAFMSD be changed back to the original TAFMSD of 30 Sep 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01911

    Original file (BC 2013 01911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s time on medical turnback was mistaken as attendance at USAFA Preparatory School, which is creditable as enlisted active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03035

    Original file (BC-2013-03035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant should have received a DD Form 214 for his prior active duty service. However, his military personnel record was not available from the National Personnel Record Center; therefore, DPSIPV was unable to verify whether the applicant’s service was continuous active duty from May 70. The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He feels a typing error was made...